|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Canada selects the Sikorsky H-92
The Canadian government has anounced the purchace of 28 Sikorsky H-92 Superhawks to replace the navy's 30 or so Sea Kings which are approximately 40 years old. Deliveries will start in 2008.
Sauron |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
But Canada already operates Merlins / Cormorants... Doesn't it look strange from a communality point of view?
Any links? |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Read about the Canadian Sea King replacement saga at http://www.sfu.ca/casr/ft-mhp1.htm
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
From Sikorsky homepage :
Quote:
I thought, a EH-101 flies farther and carries more !!! fightingirish |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
The EH-101 originally won the Canadian competition, but the order was cancelled. I seriously think re-ordering the Merlin would have been too much of an embarrasment in some Canadian political and military circles.
As for the Fat Hawk being faster, longer ranged and capable to carry more than the Merlin: yeah, right.
__________________
Regards, Arthur The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt. Bertrand Russell
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Didnt they do a flight or something with the 101 and found that its safty margin is a lot better then anything else ? They are testing it for presidentian operations or something arent they?
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
VXX Presidential Airlift replacement program
From the thread H-92 Superhawk :
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Politics did play a role starting in the late 80's when a contract was let to replace all the SAR and Navy Sea Kings and Labs with the HE-101 which as Arthur said was cancelled by our Liberal government when it came to power. It cost the taxpayers $500 million so that the Liberals could play the hero.
Later, they did purchase 15 Merlins for SAR as was said. There have been a number of reliability/quality issues with it as we know. It would appear that the deal for the H-92 is a good one so the government gets to save a little face. As to which is better, the Merlin or the Superhawk? Time will tell but there is no reason to believe the H-92 will not give good service. As to Canada being a launch customer? Well, someone has to be first. The Merlin also had a first customer. If Sikorsky got the order because of the economic benefits to Canada then that's fine with me. Sauron Sauron |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Canada made a grave mistake. It would of been logistically smoother to operate the Eh-101 in that role since the Candaian navy already has them. I wonder what prompted the Canucks to buy those choppers....price?
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
The right size for the ships, the right price, the right industrial needs, not to mention the fact that the Merlin has quality issues. It would hardly be the first time we operated more than one large type.
Sauron |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
What are the quality issues with the EH-101, anything to do with the recent grounding?
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't have the Merlin/S-92 figures in front of me but is seems logical that if the Merlin is larger, has more engines and has a longer range, they'd use that for long range rescues, but since most rescues are short range, why not my a smaller helicopter (with the resulting cost savings in operations/maintenance/purchase) for those missions? With the money you save, you can afford to buy more of the smaller ships.
In other words, don't buy a larger helicopter than you need for the job! After all, you wouldn't expect BA to fly a 777 between London and Scotland would you? |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Canada seems to have been forced to buy H-92:
"The Canadian federal government concealed the fact last week that it was forced to buy Sikorsky helicopters to replace its fleet of Sea Kings after the only other competitor in the $5-billion race had been previously disqualified on technical grounds, sources say." Source |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Steve.
As I understand it they have had fuel line leaks, tail roter cracks, cracking windscreens and console brackets, airframe cracks and hoist issues. No doubt most of these issues will be solved but the CAF has expressed some disapointment. Regards Sauron |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sauron
I can understand their disappointment if this is true. Anyone heard of these defects effecting British, Italian and Japanese EH-101's? |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Rafale, i think the article you linked to is actually worth posting entirely. Especially since it suggests this isn't the end of the saga yet.
We had joy, we had fun We had Sea Kings in the sun But the engines are on fire And the Sea Kings must retire Ottawa forced to buy Sikorsky, sources say http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servl...tory/National/ By DANIEL LEBLANC From Monday's Globe and Mail Ottawa — The federal government concealed the fact last week that it was forced to buy Sikorsky helicopters to replace its fleet of Sea Kings after the only other competitor in the $5-billion race had been previously disqualified on technical grounds, sources say. Instead of saying that the contract had been awarded to the only company that was still standing, government officials made it seem as if the contract had been a two-way race to the end. The revelation that Team Cormorant was quietly thrown out of the competition earlier this year is the latest twist in the ongoing saga that is now expected to be played out before the courts. A government official said information about Team Cormorant's disqualification was not made public last week because the government thinks it will be a pivotal point if Team Cormorant decides to launch a lawsuit over the outcome. Defence Minister Bill Graham, in announcing the decision to buy 28 helicopters from U.S.-based Sikorsky, said on Friday that it "represents the right helicopter for the Canadian Forces at the best price for Canadians." Even at a thorough technical briefing that day, senior bureaucrats did not tell journalists that the contract was awarded to the only bidder still in the running. "It gave the impression that there were two companies, and that we went for the cheapest," the government source said yesterday. There is growing bitterness between Team Cormorant and the government over the process. A senior government official yesterday dismissed a report that there was only a 1-per-cent price difference (about $50-million) between the winning bid of Sikorsky and the disqualified bid of Team Cormorant. The government is arguing that the difference was more in the range of 15 per cent, meaning that Team Cormorant's bid was about $750-million higher. The fact that Team Cormorant was disqualified in recent months is surprising because the federal government adopted a complicated process two years ago to prevent such an outcome. In 2002, the government created a "prequalification" phase under which the competing helicopters would have to meet specific technical requirements before entering the final leg of the competition, which would be settled solely on the issue of price. Team Cormorant and Sikorsky met the requirements of the prequalification process, but Team Cormorant was, nonetheless, disqualified from the competition later. The reason for Team Cormorant's disqualification is unclear, as government and industry officials remain coy about recent events. It is a stunning twist for a company that won the first competition to replace the Sea Kings in the early 1990s under the Progressive Conservative government of Brian Mulroney. That contract was cancelled by then-prime-minister Jean Chrétien in 1993, but Team Cormorant later won a smaller competition to produce search-and-rescue helicopters for the Canadian Forces. "It's an incredible outcome after Cormorant won in 1992, won in 1998, prequalified in 2003, to be told that their bid is not acceptable in 2004," an industry source said. The government now expects that its decision to exclude Team Cormorant from the competition will be at the centre of a lawsuit from AgustaWestland, the Anglo-Italian consortium that builds the aircraft. Team Cormorant has long alleged that the process to replace the Sea Kings was rigged in favour of other competitors, and has vowed to take the matter before the courts if it lost the contract. Team Cormorant has three legal options: the Canadian International Trade Tribunal, the Federal Court and the Ontario Superior Court. The CITT, an administrative tribunal, provides the quickest way ahead for Team Cormorant, which could challenge its disqualification as well as Sikorsky's qualification. If Team Cormorant wins its case, the CITT could order the retendering of the contract or call on the government to offer financial compensation to Team Cormorant. Second, the Federal Court could provide a judicial review of the process, and it could eventually send the contract back to the government for retendering. Finally, Team Cormorant could argue before the Ontario Superior Court that Sikorsky did not meet the government's requirements and did not deserve the contract. If Team Cormorant was successful, the Ontario Superior Court could order the government to offer financial compensation to Team Cormorant. In addition, the Auditor-General is expected to review the contract and determine whether the federal government adopted the best strategy to replace the Sea Kings.
__________________
Regards, Arthur The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt. Bertrand Russell
|
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Looks like the same article posted three times to me.
Sauron |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
yep loads of political play came into the deal no doubt. the earlier ordered for EH101 was cancelled when the new libral government took charge.
even though the canadian military preferred it and still prefferes it over the Sikorsky. |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Regards, Arthur The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt. Bertrand Russell
|
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think I read somewhere that the EH-101 team has had this kind of bidding problem in Australia too.
What's going on? Is this politics or are there real technical problems with EH-101? EH-101 pilots seem happy, read this- http://www.agustawestland.com/commun...ws=123&yy=2004 |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|