|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
PAK FA news
Quote:
__________________
pb:: |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
an electronic mock up? sounds like they made the CG of the aircraft.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
pb:: |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
LOL @ CG i think its a bit more complex then a doodle on 3Ds
I like it, Rapid prototyping and concurrent engineering finally being used widely, might be seeing the PAKFA fly by the end of this decade after all.
__________________
Wrinkles wrinkles my kingdom fallen to a wrinkle |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I wonder where India's contribution is (if at all there is any) to the PAK-FA. It will be very good if they are deeply involved from the concept and design stage itself.
__________________
MTFBWY |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Anything more on this aircraft. The las that was heard here was the Indian prime quoting that Russia and India had already started work on it. Any news coming out of Russia on the state of the project.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
so is this going to the iaf's MCA - replacement for Mig23/27/M2k/Jag in 2015-20
or india is planning MCA as a separate project? |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
MCA has no relation to the PAK-FA.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
It is a computer based simulation of the aircraft.
__________________
pb:: |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think India will just buy the PAK-FA later on like they did with the SU-27 and Mig-29.
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Just a couple of days back read in a newspaper that an outgoing Russian Diplomat had commented that Russia and India were thinking of inviting China to co-develop the Fifth Generation Aircraft. This if true will certainly set the cat amongst the pigeons.
But how far is it true keeping in mind that the Russians wouldnt wan to give the Chinese top of the line techology and India still having reservations about China. For all the talk of an advance in Chinese technology the fact still is that China has a long way to go to catch up with the years of Experience the Russians have. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
pb:: |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Vympel what is the current known status of new versions of the R-73 and ramjet R-77 ?
the R-73 is kinda long in tooth compared to the new gen designs flooding the market and needs a new model and ramjet R-77 is obviously necessary to match the Meteor and improve on the original R-77 shortcomings. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() The latest R-73M2 (which is in service since 1996) isn't long in the tooth, capability wise; though it could use an imaging infrared seeker, it seems quite deadly. Anyway, Jane's ALW refers to an improved R-73 variant, with speculation as to its designation (including R-74, which has been used as the rear-fire version designation by some) but its features are "unclear"- possibilities include: - an improved R-73 with gimbal-mounted motor nozzle assembly, which is in development by Vympel (improving maneuverability and range). More expensive. - A cheaper solution possibly known as R-74 with "improved seeker" and "improved TVC" (but with vanes as on the R-73 rather than the above gimbal-mount) - the aforementioned rear-fire version * presumably the more expensive one would also have the improved seeker, I assume. Vympel's K-30 is of course in the future too. As to RVV-AE-PD aka R-77M-PD, no new news. . These new missiles will probably coincide roughly with the appearance of the PAK FA in solid form.
__________________
pb:: |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Has sukhoi or anyone else released a drawing of the potential PAK-FA? I mean we don't know how this thing will look like at all
1)All we know it will be a twin engined heavy fighter to replace Mig-29 and Su-27 2)We don't know what kind of configuration will it be, where it's intakes are going to be placed, what type of wing it will have or anything. |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
~ Glenn - Endgültige Vernichtung - ! Visit the Aussie Fifth Column Forum for discussion and debate on life, politics, and weapons and warfare.
|
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
pb:: |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
pb:: |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
The latest Sukhoi is the Su-35BM with AL-41F1 engines and advanced avionics including either Phazotron's Sokol or NIIP's new Irbis radars.
Irbis is a rotating passive phased array, a newer generation than Bars but building on work done on that radar. Irbis is expected to be ready around 2006/7 so I guess this is the timeframe for the Su-35BM. The AL-41F1 program should be well advanced by then as well.
__________________
Contact me if you have unpublished pics or info related to the Hawker P.1121 or other 1950s British fighter projects. |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
Su-35BM? Any info on it?
|
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well I think "its got the AL-41F1 engine and improved avionics" pretty much qualifies as information?
There was no mention of airframe changes. The "AL-41F1" is a bit of cheat- its a staged development of the AL-31 incorporating some AL-41F technology. Makes a lot more sense than trying to shoehorn in the real AL-41F.
__________________
Contact me if you have unpublished pics or info related to the Hawker P.1121 or other 1950s British fighter projects. |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Of course, the AL-41F1 (or a variant thereof) will also power the PAK FA (unless a miracle happens and the MFI gets chosen, in which case they'll need the original AL-41F).
__________________
pb:: |
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
Rotating passive phased array means, like N011M Bars, that the phased array is not fixed but steerable. Bars is steerable in azimuth only.
The Su-35BM is featured in Air & Cosmos Number 1935 - 7 May 2004. I bet PiBu can tell us more ![]()
__________________
Contact me if you have unpublished pics or info related to the Hawker P.1121 or other 1950s British fighter projects. |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
If this 'steeribility' implies moving the antenna, does'nt then it defeats the whole purpose of phase-array.
Any idea about the weight and signal processing capability of this new radar. |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
fft, from what I have read, in the case of electronically scanned antennas the maximum angle of scanning is reduced as compared to antennas which are purely mechanically scanned. That is, that the overall volume of space which can be scanned using purely electronic scanning is lesser than what is achievable through mechanically scanned antennas. A combined mechanical + electronic scanning mechanism combines best of both worlds, that is reduced scanning times + higher agility ( from electronic scanning ) and large volume of scanned space ( from mechanical scanning) .
|
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jai your answers seems to be logical, though I suspect this 'reduction in angle of scanning' problems only happens to passive phase (because of difficulty in shaping beam with passive components). I guess Thales also has a few passive phase-array radars, are they also 'hybrid' i.e. electrical+mechanical like BARS.
|
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
Always the russians with their unexistent pakfa!!!!, i think that they will wait until the service confirmation of the f22 (if it get an strong confirmation), but im impressed by their engineers,finally they put an AL41 into falnkers!!! my supossition of an "stealth 5th generation flanker" maybe is getting real??????
|
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
All phased array radars suffer from a degredation in performance when scanning at extreme angles. The Bars radar is the worst in this respect- it steers only +-40 degrees electronically, and one can argue that the mechanical scan is a fix for this. The normal figure for a phased array (i.e. RBE-2) is +-60 degrees, while the best anyone has ever quoted is +-70 degrees (Phazotron Zhuk-MSFE). The Zhuk mechanically scanned radars have +-90degrees in azimuth, which is a lot bigger than even the best phased array can manage.
The only downside to combined mechanical/electronic scanning is the additional weight. You don't lose anything- your phased array can still operate as normal, you just gain the ability to extend the scanning limits beyond what is possible with a fixed array.
__________________
Contact me if you have unpublished pics or info related to the Hawker P.1121 or other 1950s British fighter projects. |
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yet another Su-35 incarnation? Is this Su-35BM going to be a tech demo platform, or are they still hoping to sell the Su-35 as opposed to the Su-30?
__________________
~ Glenn - Endgültige Vernichtung - ! Visit the Aussie Fifth Column Forum for discussion and debate on life, politics, and weapons and warfare.
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|