Forum Home
www.keypublishing.com

Go Back   Key Publishing Ltd Aviation Forums > Historic Aviation

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11th March 2005, 23:27
Cambridge Flyer's Avatar
Cambridge Flyer Cambridge Flyer is offline
Rank 5 Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Teversham,EGSC.
Posts: 70
Short Seamew:anything left??

Hello all!
I wondered if anyone knew,if anything remains in a museum etc,of a Short Seamew?
..Also where and when did they finally get "the chop"???

regards,

Ben.
__________________
"I just love to trip over stringers..NOT!"
Chipmunk cockpit items needed for WP977
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11th March 2005, 23:48
Flood's Avatar
Flood Flood is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Far from the maddening crowd; fortunately
Posts: 9,664
Most were sold for scrap in 1958, 1959. The exception was XE180, which was sold to Shorts Belfast for ground instruction at Shorts Apprentice School, 31/8/1959, but was short-sightedly scrapped in early 1967.
Info from Air Britains FAA Fixed-Wing Aircraft since 1946.

Flood
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12th March 2005, 11:13
Robert Whitton's Avatar
Robert Whitton Robert Whitton is offline
Rank 5 Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: near Edinburgh
Posts: 562
Here are a couple of photos I purchased many years ago. What a beautiful aircraft. It wouldnt have taken up much room in a museum with those huge folding wings. I have seen a large flying model that looked really realistic and with those wings perhaps it flew like a model. Lots were scrapped I think at Lossiemouth.
__________________
Robert Whitton,
Edinburgh, Scotland
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12th March 2005, 15:05
Cambridge Flyer's Avatar
Cambridge Flyer Cambridge Flyer is offline
Rank 5 Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Teversham,EGSC.
Posts: 70
Great pictures robert.
Seems to be a lack of pictures of these aircraft for all to see,
so i`m glad you`ve shared your photos!

regards,
Ben.
__________________
"I just love to trip over stringers..NOT!"
Chipmunk cockpit items needed for WP977
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12th March 2005, 18:13
dhfan's Avatar
dhfan dhfan is offline
Still cantankerous
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Everybody has to be somewhere
Posts: 2,615
Robin Woodhead, a member of the RR model aircraft club built a large scale Seamew a few years back. I did see it but can't remember if I ever saw it flying.
I wouldn't consider it beautiful but it was certainly impressive.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12th March 2005, 18:15
Nermal's Avatar
Nermal Nermal is offline
Meeeow!
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Not far from the litter tray
Posts: 1,745
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cambridge Flyer
Great pictures robert.
Seems to be a lack of pictures of these aircraft for all to see,
so i`m glad you`ve shared your photos!

regards,
Ben.
Why should there be - those that were accepted weren't in service for long and most went straight from manufacturer to storage to scrap with nothing more than flight testing and transit hours on the clock. - Nermal
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12th March 2005, 18:40
Will J's Avatar
Will J Will J is offline
Dakota Promoter
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dakota house- Coventry
Posts: 751
Beautiful, well it depends on your own warped idea of beauty, I think it is lovely

I have some small scale plans that I would like to enlarge to build a radio controlled one (plenty of wing area)... fascinating pictures by the way!
__________________
Classic Flight Volunteer

www.classicflightclub.com
www.thedc6.com
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12th March 2005, 19:34
robbelc robbelc is offline
Rank 5 Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: on the end of the runway at Farnborough
Posts: 699
Whats the history of the Seamew and why did it never really enter large scale service? I assume it was an Avenger replacement? Did the Gannet kill it off, or was that a few years later?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12th March 2005, 19:49
Papa Lima's Avatar
Papa Lima Papa Lima is offline
Rank 5 Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 2,930
Seamew in brief

Designed as a lightweight and simple naval aircraft.
By the beginning of 1957 only 7 out of 19 production Seamews had been accepted by the RN and soon afterwards the whole programme was cancelled as part of the 1957 economy drive.
Covered in more detail on pages 450 to 454 of "Shorts aircraft since 1900" Putnam of course!
__________________
"Aviation is a useless and expensive fad advocated by a few individuals whose ideas are unworthy of attention."
Chief of the Imperial General Staff, Sir W. G. Nicholson

Last edited by Papa Lima; 12th March 2005 at 19:50. Reason: typing error
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12th March 2005, 19:58
Nermal's Avatar
Nermal Nermal is offline
Meeeow!
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Not far from the litter tray
Posts: 1,745
Not just a naval aircraft - the MR2 was for the RAF, but got cancelled as well.
It was expected to be an anti submarine aircraft, for use (I assume) in inshore/coastal waters and not from a carrier. Whether it ever really had a role is debatable - Nermal
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 13th March 2005, 01:22
dhfan's Avatar
dhfan dhfan is offline
Still cantankerous
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Everybody has to be somewhere
Posts: 2,615
Will, if you're interested I can see if Robin ever drew up proper plans for his model, and more to the point, if he's prepared to part with them.
It's years ago so I can't really remember but I guess it was around 9 or 10ft wingspan.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 13th March 2005, 03:57
Flood's Avatar
Flood Flood is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Far from the maddening crowd; fortunately
Posts: 9,664
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cambridge Flyer
Seems to be a lack of pictures of these aircraft for all to see,
Found these on the net...





The Seamew was designed to fill a need for a cheap, lightweight, and simple anti submarine patrol aircraft for NATO, with the idea being that large numbers would be needed, in the event of war, to protect ships and harbours. The Fleet Air Arm issued Specification M.123 in 1951 and Shorts designed the SB.6 around it. The design was selected and orders placed in April 1952, with the first prototype flew on 13/8/53 in the hands of WJ Runciman although it was damaged when it undershot on landing. The RAF decided that it could use the Seamew to supplement the Shackleton (and Lancaster) for shorter range patrols, and the MR2 was similar to the AS1 but with larger wheels and low pressure tyres, although without the equipement needed for carrier operation: despite lacking the power folding mechanism the wings could still be folded manually.
An order was placed in Febuary 1955 for 60 aircraft (split down the middle between the FAA and RAF), and naval service flight trials were carried out with 700NAS in November 1956, which included around 200 take offs and landings on HMS Warrior. The RAF lost interest after four MR2s were built, and three of them were converted to AS1 whilst the fourth was used (unsuccessfully) for a sales tour before crashing during a display on 9/6/1956, killing Runciman. Meanwhile the FAA decided that the RNVRs Avengers would be replaced by Seamews, but only four had been taken on charge by the time the RNVR squadrons were disbanded in March 1957, before any Seamews were allocated to them. Seven aircraft eventually delivered to the FAA were scrapped at RNAS Lossiemouth, and the other eleven, complete and awaiting delivery, were scrapped at Sydenham (including - eventually - the one used by the apprentice school).

Flood
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 13th March 2005, 12:19
robbelc robbelc is offline
Rank 5 Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: on the end of the runway at Farnborough
Posts: 699
Thanks for that sounds like the familiar government/ service indecision and blundering.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12th December 2006, 18:25
TraceyR TraceyR is offline
Rank 4 Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1
late entry: Seamew engine survives!

I have just discovered that at least a Seamew engine survives, conserved and exhibited by the Rolls-Royce Heritage Trust, Coventry Branch.
I have just come across a reference to it at
http://www.crossandcockade.com/files/UK%20ENGINES.doc

I wonder which aircraft it was in - perhaps someone here has an answer.

I hope that my attachment is visible - it's a scanned-in page from a Short's house magazine, including a photo of the pilot (my father) preparing to take it up for its first flight (this picture, and a few others, is also on Wikipedia - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Short_Seamew).
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Seamew_page.JPG
Views:	169
Size:	254.9 KB
ID:	148730  
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12th December 2006, 19:29
Thunderbird167's Avatar
Thunderbird167 Thunderbird167 is offline
607 Squadron Historian
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: South Wales
Posts: 402
There is also a single Mamba at the North East Aircraft Museum which I belive came from a Seamew
__________________
Dave Charles
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12th December 2006, 20:53
Kernowglyn Kernowglyn is offline
Very Old, so wasn't Bold
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Penzance, Cornwall, UK
Posts: 81
One feature the type had, which I think was unique, were the windscreen wipers with one sweeping the lower half and the other the top. Normally an aircraft lands at 30% faster than its stalling speed on an airfield, (1.3Vstall) but on a carrier it is only 10% above. In the Seamews case the combination of large wing area and low weight prevented this from happening and it was subjected to considerable buffeting on the landing approach due to disturbed airflow around the carriers island and deck. They found on trials that they had to land faster on a carrier than they did on land. That may have been unique too. The trials at sea stopped when a signal was received telling them that the type was not going to be accepted for service. I know someone who was part of the trials team who told me that nobody wanted the data collected during the trials when they docked in the UK and it was dumped.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12th December 2006, 21:44
alertken alertken is offline
Rank 5 Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: london
Posts: 499
Not really indecision/blundering. Things change. Initiated in 1951, partly with Mutual Support Program $ in Korean urge, the idea was to keep Light Fleets in commission after the Strike carriers arrived. Proper matelots would be on those, so RNVR would man Glory/Ocean/Theseus/Triumph, convoy escort. Seamew was to keep Russkie subs down, hoping they would not discover the modest payload of a wooden machine. RAuxAF would similarly clear port approaches.

In 1955 Defence Minister Macmillan decided USSR Threat was best handled by professionals, far from home ports. Amateur flyers to be chopped by 1957, MR on Shacks alone, Regular FAA to fly Gannets off younger carriers.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 13th December 2006, 10:41
RPSmith RPSmith is offline
ex Midland A.M. member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Coventry
Posts: 2,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by TraceyR View Post
I have just discovered that at least a Seamew engine survives, conserved and exhibited by the Rolls-Royce Heritage Trust, Coventry Branch.
I have just come across a reference to it at
http://www.crossandcockade.com/files/UK%20ENGINES.doc
Thanks TraceyR - I didn't realise the BAPC's preserved engine list was available on line.

Roger Smith.
__________________
A Blenheim, Beaufighter and Beaufort - together in one Museum. Who'd have thought that possible in 1967?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 13th December 2006, 12:37
Cees Broere's Avatar
Cees Broere Cees Broere is offline
Rank 5 Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Amstelveen
Posts: 1,661
Hmm, since when does Wellington N2980 at Brooklands have two Hercules engines fitted?

Hercules - 1935, 1290-1665hp, 38.7lt, 14R 2r s/v, a, s, g, 1890lb
6 Dumfries & Galloway: nos.311919 &
312247 ex-Wellington 10 HE746
crash site
Midland Warplane Museum:
no. A221555, ex-Beaufighter X7943
XI Yorks Air Museum: H53411/A220958
XVI Birmingham Museum of Science &
Industry: no.5407, sectioned
Brooklands Museum: sectioned
Hendon: Wellington 10 MF628
Imperial War Museum: no.SS14513/
A381493
Norfolk & Suffolk: ex-Wellington I
XVII Hendon: Beaufighter 10 RD253
XVIII Brooklands Museum: two in Wellington
N2980 restoration ex-Loch Ness

Hendon
100 East Midlands Aeropark VA: ex-Hastings
Museum of Flight: sectioned &
motorised
RRHT Bristol: no.133556
106 Aeroplane Collection
Cosford: Hastings 5 TG511
__________________
Ultravox at Lokeren 08.08.09, I was there!
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 14th December 2006, 16:11
RPSmith RPSmith is offline
ex Midland A.M. member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Coventry
Posts: 2,129
Cees - please don't knock it.
This listing was prepared by volunteers who have to ask/cajole/bully other volunteers (mostly) into supplying the data.
It has some mistakes or, in some cases is out of date but IMHO better than no list at all.

Roger Smith.
__________________
A Blenheim, Beaufighter and Beaufort - together in one Museum. Who'd have thought that possible in 1967?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 15:09.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Key Publishing Ltd