View Single Post
  #203  
Old 19th March 2009, 13:44
djcross djcross is offline
Rank 5 Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by flex297 View Post
Provide data to support this claim first!

The GAO report says:
- more than $300 billion to acquire 2,456 aircraft - equals more than $122mil a piece
- $760 billion in life cycle operating and support costs

In my world, spare parts, support equipment and training equipment belong to the *life cycle operating and support costs* category. They always have and they always will. You got it written there, black on white!

So, where is the *it will cost $75mil in 2014* claim now?
The US government (this includes GAO) has established exacting definitions for the cost elements rolled up in several indenture levels:
  • Flyaway cost = airframe + engine + avionics
  • Weapons system cost = flyaway cost + support equipment + technical publications + training data & training equipment + advanced procurement
  • Procurement cost = weapons system cost + initial spares
  • Program cost = procurement cost + research & development + test & evaluation + military construction
  • Life cycle cost = program cost + fuel + POL + operations & maintenance personnel costs

People make apples to oranges mistakes when comparing costs at different indenture levels. A favorite mistake is comparing the F-22's program cost ($250+ Million) against the flyaway cost of a eurocanard ($90 million).
Reply With Quote